Australian Government To Pass Fluoride Bill
The Australian Gov wants to spray airisolised fluride on all our foods now!
So you think you know where money comes from?
By Colin Smith, Glasgow City
So where? Where does the money you have in your pocket and in your bank account come from?
Who created it?
It comes from the Government! ... Nope. It doesn't.
It comes from the Treasury! ... Nope. And that's part of the government.
It comes from the Mint! ... Nope. It doesn't, though they do print some.
It comes from the Bank of England! ... Generally Nope. Though they do have the ability.
Of all of the money we have, almost all of it is created by your local bank. Yes, created.
In the UK, the system of banking we use is called Fractional Reserve Banking. This is a system whereby the government allows the bank to hold a small reserve of any cash it has been given, and then loan out up to the value of the rest. They have to hold on to, on average, about 3% of the cash as "reserves".
The act of loaning out the cash literally creates new money. This is where all of our money comes from. I can feel the scepticism from here. The bank just loans out your money doesn't it, that doesn't create new money...
Well... This is how Fractional Reserve Banking creates new money. Lets pretend the reserve ratio is 10% for easy calculation.
1: The mint prints £100 and gives it to you (Person A).
2: You (Person A) take it to Bank A. They now have £100 in your bank account...
3: Someone else (Person B) goes to Bank A and borrows £90 at 5%. Bank A legally has to hold on to £10 as reserve.
4: Person B sticks the borrowed money into their bank account in Bank B. Bank B now has £90.
5: Person C comes along to Bank B and borrows £81 at 5%. Bank B holds on to £9 as reserves.
6: Person C sticks the £81 money into his account at Bank A.
Now...
Bank A now has 181 pounds in their accounts, Bank B has 90 pounds in their accounts...
That does not add up to the 100 pounds the mint originally printed. There is now, £271 worth of cash in our economy. There is £171 worth of new money.
Person A still has £100
Person B now has £90
Person C now has £81
Now, I don't know if you noticed, but as well as the £171 of money which has been created from nothing by the banks when the loans were taken out, there has also been £171 worth of debt created at exactly the same moment.
So there you have it. Almost all of our money (97% of the money in circulation) was created by your friendly local bank, wasn't that nice of them.
But wait.
They don't create this money from nothing for the good of their health. They are slaving over those hot books 8 hours a day to loan you that money they just created... from nothing... They charge interest on the cash which they created from nothing for your loan. They charge interest on the debt. But... if they charge interest, and 97% of our cash comes from loans, how can we repay all the debts?
I've established that almost all of our money is "borrowed into existence"... But if that's the case and the banks charge interest on it that means that more must be repaid than was ever created.
A £100 loan at 5%.
£100 cash and £100 of debt.
1 year later.
£100 cash and £105 of debt. Pay off £20.
1 year later.
£80 cash and £89 debt. Pay off £20.
1 year later.
£60 cash and £72 debt. Pay off £20.
1 year later.
£40 cash and £54 debt. pay off £20.
1 year later.
£20 cash and £35 debt. Pay off £20.
1 year later.
£0 cash and £16 debt...
Oops. No money left in the economy, there is none in existence but we still owe a debt of £16.
What's the solution? Well... What happens at the moment is we simply take out another larger loan to pay off the existing loan and interest and postpone the problem. The debts get larger every year and the amount of money and debt in the economy grows every year.
This is where all the money in our economy comes from and it is also where all the debt in the economy comes from. Our monetary system is debt based, we have trillions of pounds of money and even more trillions of pounds of debt.
So, our money is created by the high street banks; Abbey National, Alliance & Leicester, Barclays, HBOS, HSBC, Lloyds. It is created from debt we owe to these banks, it is not created by the government.
This animated Film explains very simply how our system works.
Please pass it on.
So where? Where does the money you have in your pocket and in your bank account come from?
Who created it?
It comes from the Government! ... Nope. It doesn't.
It comes from the Treasury! ... Nope. And that's part of the government.
It comes from the Mint! ... Nope. It doesn't, though they do print some.
It comes from the Bank of England! ... Generally Nope. Though they do have the ability.
Of all of the money we have, almost all of it is created by your local bank. Yes, created.
In the UK, the system of banking we use is called Fractional Reserve Banking. This is a system whereby the government allows the bank to hold a small reserve of any cash it has been given, and then loan out up to the value of the rest. They have to hold on to, on average, about 3% of the cash as "reserves".
The act of loaning out the cash literally creates new money. This is where all of our money comes from. I can feel the scepticism from here. The bank just loans out your money doesn't it, that doesn't create new money...
Well... This is how Fractional Reserve Banking creates new money. Lets pretend the reserve ratio is 10% for easy calculation.
1: The mint prints £100 and gives it to you (Person A).
2: You (Person A) take it to Bank A. They now have £100 in your bank account...
3: Someone else (Person B) goes to Bank A and borrows £90 at 5%. Bank A legally has to hold on to £10 as reserve.
4: Person B sticks the borrowed money into their bank account in Bank B. Bank B now has £90.
5: Person C comes along to Bank B and borrows £81 at 5%. Bank B holds on to £9 as reserves.
6: Person C sticks the £81 money into his account at Bank A.
Now...
Bank A now has 181 pounds in their accounts, Bank B has 90 pounds in their accounts...
That does not add up to the 100 pounds the mint originally printed. There is now, £271 worth of cash in our economy. There is £171 worth of new money.
Person A still has £100
Person B now has £90
Person C now has £81
Now, I don't know if you noticed, but as well as the £171 of money which has been created from nothing by the banks when the loans were taken out, there has also been £171 worth of debt created at exactly the same moment.
So there you have it. Almost all of our money (97% of the money in circulation) was created by your friendly local bank, wasn't that nice of them.
But wait.
They don't create this money from nothing for the good of their health. They are slaving over those hot books 8 hours a day to loan you that money they just created... from nothing... They charge interest on the cash which they created from nothing for your loan. They charge interest on the debt. But... if they charge interest, and 97% of our cash comes from loans, how can we repay all the debts?
I've established that almost all of our money is "borrowed into existence"... But if that's the case and the banks charge interest on it that means that more must be repaid than was ever created.
A £100 loan at 5%.
£100 cash and £100 of debt.
1 year later.
£100 cash and £105 of debt. Pay off £20.
1 year later.
£80 cash and £89 debt. Pay off £20.
1 year later.
£60 cash and £72 debt. Pay off £20.
1 year later.
£40 cash and £54 debt. pay off £20.
1 year later.
£20 cash and £35 debt. Pay off £20.
1 year later.
£0 cash and £16 debt...
Oops. No money left in the economy, there is none in existence but we still owe a debt of £16.
What's the solution? Well... What happens at the moment is we simply take out another larger loan to pay off the existing loan and interest and postpone the problem. The debts get larger every year and the amount of money and debt in the economy grows every year.
This is where all the money in our economy comes from and it is also where all the debt in the economy comes from. Our monetary system is debt based, we have trillions of pounds of money and even more trillions of pounds of debt.
So, our money is created by the high street banks; Abbey National, Alliance & Leicester, Barclays, HBOS, HSBC, Lloyds. It is created from debt we owe to these banks, it is not created by the government.
This animated Film explains very simply how our system works.
Please pass it on.
Powered by ScribeFire.
Ex-UN Weapons Inspector Ritter Asks If Bush, Cheney Planned Implosion Of WTC
TruthAlliance.net
Wednesday, January 23, 2008
In his usual form, former U.N. weapons inspector Scott Ritter told a packed crowd at the Oriental Theater in Denver to stop whining about corporate media and become their own intelligence operatives. We the people have the same resources and tools that intelligence networks rely heavily on; it’s called “Google” he said.
In his hilarious analogy, the American people like baby birds wait each night in front of their television sets for the corporate news bird to land in their living room and lovingly puke down our necks with that day’s regurgitated news. Suggesting that as our own intelligence operatives we can’t allow CNN, FOX, NBC, and ABC to edit and cherry pick information, but ask questions and find the answers ourselves.
In that vein TruthAlliance.net Editor Jason Charles had a few questions for Mr. Ritter which he graciously allowed us to film. We explored 3 topics, if the Bush admin got its way in the mid-east what would it look like, how can these dis-separate yet justice driven revolutions in America unite, and his amazing thoughts on a new, fully empowered investigation into the cause of 9-11.
He asked, “Did Bush and Cheney Plan the demise of the building? Was this a terrorist attack by Al-Qaeda? Or was it something in between? Well frankly we don’t know.” How important is this to establishing justice? Mr. Ritter seems to think it is an “absolute requirement to know what happened on 9-11”
Biometric Surveillance Control Grid Revealing Itself
read more | digg story
Scientific Study Finds Fluoride Horror Stories Factual
Scientific Study Finds Fluoride Horror Stories Factual
Industrial by-product consumed by millions of Australians lowers IQ, causes cancer
| Paul Joseph Watson | d |
The establishment media will have to find a new tactic with which to ridicule those who oppose the fluoridation of water after a major new Scientific American report concluded that "Scientific attitudes toward fluoridation may be starting to shift" as new evidence emerges of the poison's link to disorders affecting teeth, bones, the brain and the thyroid gland, as well as lowering IQ.
"Today almost 60 percent of the U.S. population drinks fluoridated water, including residents of 46 of the nation’s 50 largest cities," reports Scientific American's Dan Fagin.
Fagin is an award-wining environmental reporter and Director of New York University's Science, Health and Environmental Reporting Program.
"Outside the U.S., fluoridation has spread to Canada, the U.K., Australia, New Zealand and a few other countries. Critics of the practice have generally been dismissed as gadflies or zealots by mainstream researchers and public health agencies in those countries as well as the U.S. (In other nations, however, water fluoridation is rare and controversial.)"
(Article continues below)
Indeed, the zeitgeist for scoffing at those who spoke of the dangers of mass medicating the public against their will with fluoride was the deranged and paranoid character of General Ripper in the hit 1964 Peter Selllers movie Dr. Strangelove.
But that stereotype is quickly fading as serious scientific research uncovers proof that all the horror stories about sodium fluoride told down the decades are essentially true.
The Scientific American study "Concluded that fluoride can subtly alter endocrine function, especially in the thyroid -- the gland that produces hormones regulating growth and metabolism."
The report also notes that "a series of epidemiological studies in China have associated high fluoride exposures with lower IQ."
"Epidemiological studies and tests on lab animals suggest that high fluoride exposure increases the risk of bone fracture, especially in vulnerable populations such as the elderly and diabetics," writes Fagin.
Fagin interviewed Steven Levy, director of the Iowa Fluoride Study which tracked about 700 Iowa children for sixteen years. Nine-year-old "Iowa children who lived in communities where the water was fluoridated were 50 percent more likely to have mild fluorosis... than [nine-year-old] children living in nonfluoridated areas of the state," writes Fagin.
The study adds to a growing literature of shocking scientific studies proving fluoride's link with all manner of health defects, even as governments in the west, including recently the UK, make plans to mass medicate the population against their will with this deadly toxin.
In 2005, a study conducted at the Harvard School of Dental Health found that fluoride in tap water directly contributes to causing bone cancer in young boys.
"New American research suggests that boys exposed to fluoride between the ages of five and 10 will suffer an increased rate of osteosarcoma - bone cancer - between the ages of 10 and 19," according to a London Observer article about the study.
Based on the findings of the study, the respected Environmental Working Group lobbied to have fluoride in tap water be added to the US government's classified list of substances known or anticipated to cause cancer in humans.
Cancer rates in the U.S. have skyrocketed with one in three people now contracting the disease at some stage in their life.
The link to bone cancer has also been discovered by other scientists, but a controversy ensued after it emerged that Harvard Professor Chester Douglass, who downplayed the connection in his final report, was in fact editor-in-chief of The Colgate Oral Health Report, a quarterly newsletter funded by Colgate-Palmolive Co., which makes fluoridated toothpaste.
An August 2006 Chinese study found that fluoride in drinking water damages children's liver and kidney functions.
FACTS ABOUT FLUORIDE
- Fluoride is a waste by-product of the fertilizer and aluminum industry and it's also a Part II Poison under the UK Poisons Act 1972.
- Fluoride is one of the basic ingredients in both PROZAC (FLUoxetene Hydrochloride) and Sarin nerve gas (Isopropyl-Methyl-Phosphoryl FLUoride).
- USAF Major George R. Jordan testified before Un-American Activity committees of Congress in the 1950's that in his post as U.S.-Soviet liaison officer, the Soviets openly admitted to "Using the fluoride in the water supplies in their concentration camps, to make the prisoners stupid, docile, and subservient."
- The first occurrence of fluoridated drinking water on Earth was found in Germany's Nazi prison camps. The Gestapo had little concern about fluoride's supposed effect on children's teeth; their alleged reason for mass-medicating water with sodium fluoride was to sterilize humans and force the people in their concentration camps into calm submission. (Ref. book: "The Crime and Punishment of I.G. Farben" by Joseph Borkin.)
- 97% of western Europe has rejected fluoridated water due to the known health risks, however 10% of Britons drink it and the UK government is trying to fast track the fluoridation of the entire country's water supply.
- In Germany, Belgium and Luxembourg fluoridation of water was rejected because it was classified as compulsive medication against the subject's will and therefore violated fundamental human rights.
- In November of 2006, the American Dental Association (ADA) advised that parents should avoid giving babies fluoridated water.
- Sources of fluoride include: fluoride dental products, fluoride pesticides, fluoridated pharmaceuticals, processed foods made with fluoridated water, and tea.
Click here to find out if your water supply is poisoned with deadly fluoride.
Please donate to this effort,
Please visite the Ron Paul DVD bomb site to help them distribute RP DVD's
Message from Ron Paul
What a day! I am humbled and inspired, grateful and thrilled for this vast outpouring of support.
On just one day, in honor of the 234th anniversary of the Boston Tea Party, the new American revolutionaries brought in $6.04 million, another one-day record. The average donation was $102; we had 58,407 individual contributors, of whom an astounding 24,915 were first-time donors. And it was an entirely voluntary, self-organized, decentralized, independent effort on the internet. Must be the "spammers" I keep hearing about!
The establishment is baffled and worried, and well they should be. They keep asking me who runs our internet fundraising and controls our volunteers. To these top-down central planners, a spontaneous order like our movement is science-fiction. But you and I know it's real: as real as the American people's yearning for freedom, peace, and prosperity, as real as all the men and women who have sacrificed for our ideals, in the past and today.
And how neat to see celebrations all across the world, with Tea Parties from France to New Zealand. This is how we can spread the ideals of our country, through voluntary emulation, not bombs and bribes. Of course, there were hundreds in America.
As I dropped in on a cheering, laughing crowd of about 600 near my home in Freeport, Texas, I noted that they call us "angry." Well, we are the happiest, most optimistic "angry" movement ever, and the most diverse. What unites us is a love of liberty, and a determination to fix what is wrong with our country, from the Fed to the IRS, from warfare to welfare. But otherwise we are a big tent.
Said the local newspaper: "The elderly sat with teens barely old enough to vote. The faces were black, Hispanic, Asian and white. There was no fear in their voices as they spoke boldly with each other about the way the country should be. Held close like a deeply held secret, Paul has brought them out of the disconnect they feel between what they know to be true and where the country has been led."
Thanks also to the 500 or so who braved the blizzard in Boston to go to Faneuil Hall. My son Rand told me what a great time he had with you.
A few mornings ago on LewRockwell.com, I saw a YouTube of a 14-year-old boy that summed up our whole movement for me. This well-spoken young man, who could have passed in knowledge for a college graduate, told how he heard our ideas being denounced. So he decided to Google. He read some of my speeches, and thought, these make sense. Then he studied US foreign policy of recent years, and came to the conclusion that we are right. So he persuaded his father to drop Rudy Giuliani and join our movement.
All over America, all over the world, we are inspiring real change. With the wars and the spying, the spending and the taxing, the inflation and the credit crisis, our ideas have never been more needed. Please help me spread them https://www.ronpaul2008.com/donate in all 50 states. Victory for liberty! That is our goal, and nothing less.
Sincerely,
Ron
Consensus Shattered As Major Scientific Study Says Global W
read more | digg story
Ex-Italian President: Intel Agencies Know 9/11 An Inside Job
Paul Joseph WatsonPrison Planet
Tuesday, December 4, 2007
Man who set up Operation Gladio tells Italy's largest newspaper that the 9/11 attacks on NY were run by CIA, Mossad
Ex-Italian President: Intel Agencies Know 9/11 An Inside Job
Man who set up Operation Gladio tells Italy's largest newspaper attacks were run by CIA, Mossad
Former Italian President and the man who revealed the existence of Operation Gladio Francesco Cossiga has gone public on 9/11, telling Italy's most respected newspaper that the attacks were run by the CIA and Mossad and that this was common knowledge amongst global intelligence agencies.
Cossiga was elected President of the Italian Senate in July 1983 before winning a landslide 1985 election to become President of the country in 1985.
Cossiga gained respect from opposition parties as one of a rare breed - an honest politician - and led the country for seven years until April 1992.
Cossiga's tendency to be outspoken upset the Italian political establishment and he was forced to resign after revealing the existence of, and his part in setting up, Operation Gladio - a rogue intelligence network under NATO auspices that carried out bombings across Europe in the 60's, 70's and 80's. Gladio's specialty was to carry out what they coined "false flag operations," terror attacks that were blamed on their domestic and geopolitical opposition.
Cossiga's revelations contributed to an Italian parliamentary investigation of Gladio in 2000, during which evidence was unearthed that the attacks were being overseen by the U.S. intelligence apparatus.
In March 2001, Gladio agent Vincenzo Vinciguerra stated, in sworn testimony, "You had to attack civilians, the people, women, children, innocent people, unknown people far removed from any political game. The reason was quite simple: to force ... the public to turn to the state to ask for greater security."
Cossiga's new revelations appeared last week in Italy's oldest and most widely read newspaper, Corriere della Sera. Below appears a rough translation.
"[Bin Laden supposedly confessed] to the Qaeda September [attack] to the two towers in New York [claiming to be] the author of the attack of the 11, while all the [intelligence services] of America and Europe ... now know well that the disastrous attack has been planned and realized from the CIA American and the Mossad with the aid of the Zionist world in order to put under accusation the Arabic Countries and in order to induce the western powers to take part ... in Iraq [and] Afghanistan."
Cossiga first expressed his doubts about 9/11 in 2001, and is quoted in Webster Tarpley's book as stating that "The mastermind of the attack must have been a “sophisticated mind, provided with ample means not only to recruit fanatic kamikazes, but also highly specialized personnel. I add one thing: it could not be accomplished without infiltrations in the radar and flight security personnel.”
Coming from a widely respected former head of state, Cossiga's assertion that the 9/11 attacks were an inside job and that this is common knowledge amongst global intelligence agencies is highly unlikely to be mentioned by any establishment media outlets, because like the hundreds of other sober ex-government, military, air force professionals, allied to hundreds more professors and intellectuals - he can't be sidelined as a crackpot conspiracy theorist.
Naomi Wolf talks to Alex Jones about her new book : The End of America (Audio Interview)
Part 1
It is very rushed, and gets cut off at the end of Part III, so if you want to read the whole scoop, please get Namoi Wolf's book for yourself or someone else as a holiday gift: The End of America - Letter to a Young Patriot Parts II & III below. She mentions Ron Paul favorably at the end of Part II.
Part 2
Part 3
Get it at Amazon now: The End of America - Letter to a Young Patriot
police test Remote Control Drone In Texas, USA -- EXPOSED!
read more | digg story
9/13/2001: How Could 9/11 Hijackers Obtain Secret Service Codes?
Carl Sagan Who Speaks For Earth 03
Wow This is a great little wake up call to stop spending so much on war.
Chinese soldiers shooting at Tibetan pilgrims
Ron Paul Philadelphia Veterans? Rally Draws 5,000
read more | digg story
(video) AT&T whistleblower: I was forced to connect 'big brother machine' that spys on every one using the internet.
The following video is from MSNBC's Countdown, broadcast on November 7, 2007.
Asch's Conformity Experiment
This is classic, This is how the media gets an opinion no matter how untrue or scientifically false (the official 911 conspiracy) to be the popular opinion.
THINK FOR YOUR SELF!.
Ten Questions That Every Intelligent Skeptic Must Answer
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)