| David Shayler, is a former MI5 (British Security Service) officer who was prosecuted under the Official Secrets Act after passing documents to the Mail on Sunday newspaper in August, 1997 For Whistle blowing the fact that MI5 was paranoid about socialists and that it had previously investigated Labour Party ministers Peter Mandelson, Jack Straw and Harriet Harman. Now He is whistle blowing Some more about 9/11 live on Sky News! | |
| Since Tony Blair's New Labour government came to power in 1997, the UK civil liberties landscape has changed dramatically. ASBOs were introduced by Section 1 of the Crime and Disorder Act 1998 and first used in 1999. The right to remain silent is no longer universal. Our right to privacy, free from interception of communications has been severely curtailed. The ability to travel without surveillance (or those details of our journeys being retained) has disappeared. Indeed, as Henry Porter (the Observer journalist famous for his recent email clash with Tony Blair over the paring down of civil liberties) reveals in this unsettling film, our movements are being watched, and recorded, more than ever before. We have to start controlling how these technologies get used and not just say hay lets see where this takes us because it will take us to a place so dark even Hitler couldn't have dreamed it up. | |
WHERE ARE YOUR PAPERS! hmmmm
its getting closer. WAKE UP!
expose this. Tell your friends about this site.
FOX report! Government can has now admitted listen to you even when your mobile is in standby!
The FBI has now admitted that they can listen to anyone with a mobile! and through further research I have found that the phone doesn't even need to be in standby! it can be OFF!!!!! and the only way to stop it is to take the batteries out of the thing.! THIS IS OUT OF CONTROL!
PEOPLE NEED TO BE DEMONSTRATING! PEOPLE NEED TO BE OUTRAGED! THIS IS JUST WRONG!
They Say its for your safty they say its for your protection! Well I would rather have my liberties that a false sence of protection from a governmant that cant be trusted.
Washington and Jefferson, taught us a basic lesson we need to remember: don't blindly trust your government.
| What price are you paying for being well connected digitally in the post-information age? Who do you trust? Well I can tell you now that corporations cant be trusted because they one and only goal is to make money and if that means selling collected data for mining then they will, What we the people must do is reform law to make it illegal to keep records on an individual for more that 1 month. | |
| This song By Bob Dylan made me cry as I realised that the compassion is draining out of our de-sensitised glutinous youth, to preoccupied and buried in their exorbitant mortgages, chasing for the dollar, video games, getting worked up only for pointless sports, sex and non reality. Masters of War, Is speaking against what Eisenhower was calling a military industrial complex as he was making his exit from the presidency. "In the counsels of Government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the Military Industrial Complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists, and will persist. We must never let the weight of this combination endanger our liberties or democratic processes." -- President Dwight Eisenhower | |
| Hi there Every one, after a year of exposing the New world order I thought I'd give my fantastic readers a bit of a break with something funny IE this Chopper Read impersonation. For all you People overseas Check out the movie "chopper".Its about a Real life Aussie Visual-anti called Chopper Read Who is still alive today. Very funny but disturbing movie about the Australian Underground. | |
| James H. Fetzer PhD explores what we know know that we didn't know then about 9/11. This was taken from a talk given 10-1-06 at the University of Wisconsin - Madison. | |
| Jim Marrs quickly lays out all the main points that demonstrate 9/11 was an inside job planned and executed by the U.S. government. This is raw, public domain interview footage, portions of which appear in the documentary "One Nation Under Siege" | |
CSI NY! This video Will take you through the science that is presented by PhD and prestigious scientists to deconstruct the 911 tragedy. One thing that I think is that the steal you put white hot coals on in your fire place take punishment all through winter. White hot coals Day in Day out and it doesn't melt. and that is quite thin normal steel. The trade centers Had 4 inch thick! INDUSTREAL STRENGTH STEEL! Sprayed with a coating of asbestos! and the fires burning in the trade centers where going out! you can see its all black smoke because they where getting starved of oxygen! Their where explosions! watch this video and learn. PEACE! | |
| The War on Iraq, filmmaker Robert Greenwald chronicles the Bush Administration's determined quest to invade Iraq following the events of September 11, 2001. The film deconstructs the administration's case for war through interviews with U.S intelligence and defense officials, foreign service experts, and U.N. weapons inspectors -- including a former CIA director, a former ambassador to Saudi Arabia and even President Bush's Secretary of the Army. Their analysts and conclusions are sobering, and often disturbing, regardless of one's political affiliations. | |
THE Government has embarked on its most reckless policy to date in pursuing the idea of national identity cards. The initiative will fundamentally change the nature of government and the character of the nation.
This is inevitable because the modern ID card is no simple piece of plastic. It is the visible component of a web of interactive technology that fuses the most intimate characteristics of the individual with the machinery of state.
It is the means by which the powers of government will be streamlined and amplified. Almost every national ID card system introduced in the past 15 years has contained three components with the potential to devastate personal freedom and privacy.
In addition, its introduction must be accompanied by a substantial increase in police power. After all, authorities will want to be able to demand the card in a wide range of circumstances, and people must be compelled to comply.
The most significant, yet most subtle, element is that the card and its numbering system will permit the linking of information between all government departments. The number is ultimately the most powerful element of the system.
Such a system, linked through tens of thousand of card readers to a central database, is the conventional means of dealing with the problem of counterfeit cards.
But the technology gap between governments and organised crime has narrowed so much that even the most highly secure cards are available as blanks, weeks after their official introduction. Criminals and terrorists can move more freely and more safely with several fake identities than they ever could in a country with multiple forms of ID.
To make sure people are who they claim to be, the new generation of cards, such as those introduced this year in Malaysia, incorporate a chip containing the "biometric" - a fingerprint, retina or hand scan of the holder. The card and the finger are placed into a reader, and the person is "validated".
Authorities can gain further personal information stored on the chip to confirm the holder's identity. This validation process can be done anywhere - on the streets, in airports, schools, banks, swimming pools or office buildings.
You will not hear any government emphasising these aspects. Instead, the new ID systems are benignly promoted as "citizen cards" that guarantee entitlement to benefits and services.
Five years ago, the Government quietly buried proposals for ID cards when it discovered that they would cost billions of pounds more than expected, would do little to prevent crime, and might become wildly unpopular.
How much more unpopular will they be when people learn that a scan of their body parts will be required?
If an ID card was unworkable five years ago, why would it work now? The short answer is that it would not - unless the biometric were added and the whole system verified through a national database. That is not a card: it is a national surveillance infrastructure.
If such a scheme is introduced in the current climate, three outcomes are inevitable. First, a high-security card will become an internal passport, demanded in limitless situations. (Don't leave home without it.)
Second, millions of people will be severely inconvenienced each year through lost, stolen or damaged cards, or through failure of computer systems or the biometric reading machinery.
Finally, the cards will inevitably be abused by officials who will use them as a mechanism for prejudice, discrimination or harassment.
No one has been able to identify any country where cards have deterred terrorists. To achieve this, a government would require measures unthinkable in a free society.
The Government thus faces a choice. Either it introduces a high-security biometric card that will challenge every tenet of freedom, or it introduces a low-security card that will soon be available to criminals and terrorists on the black market.
Or, of course, it can scrap the whole idea and concentrate on more proven measures to deal with terrorism like looking at foreign policy.
More links
Just another smoking gun
-----Forwarded Message-----
From:
Sent: Jul 11, 2006 9:09 PM
To:
Subject: Fw: "It's all over"?
Major General Albert Stubblebine III, as I mentioned in an earlier post, is the latest in a long line of high-ranking US military officers to openly challenge the official LIE about 9/11.
Stubblebine was in charge of Imagery Interpretation for Scientific and Technical Intelligence Â- a highly specialized area that certainly qualifies him as an expert in the field of electronic intelligence gathering, especially imaging.
A friend and colleague who was an officer in US Army Intelligence just informed me that he had served directly under General Stubblebine for many years. So high is my friend's esteem of the General, he had only this to say:
Â"If Stubblebine is standing up to be counted, it's all over".
A brief clip of the General's interview is attached.
